16:55 Écrit par razlebol - | Lien permanent | Commentaires (0) |  Facebook |



De : QUERE JEAN LUC [mailto:]
Envoyé : samedi 24 juillet 2010 19:56
À : 'yeager@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'amarkham@cleanair-coolplanet.org'
Cc : 'cwake@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'lsullivan@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'rstephenson@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'astephenson@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'bsheppard@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'sschroeter@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'croby@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'drizza@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'rrepetto@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'rpomerance@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'kparker@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'bnewman@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'bhough@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'cisber@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'ckoehler@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'maguire@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'amuise@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'sharpster@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'belkus@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'jdundorf@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'adowling@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'adecossy@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'bburtis@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'jburnett@cleanair-coolplanet.org'; 'jandrews@cleanair-coolplanet.org'
Objet : carbon dioxide reducing... Solution !


Let me introduce myself to you. I am Mister Jean-Luc Quéré, a French citizen, and a biotechnologist.

Whatever the difficulties encountered I have developed technologies allowing the treatment of carbon dioxide while transforming it into a raw material producing energy.

Owing to the global warming, it is hard to believe it , but it is true :

This was done with limited means and under very approximate security conditions. I beg you pardon and count on your comprehension. I do what I can with assets at my disposal !



My life is threatened !


But we have no time to live under threat. Death is close, even if for a majority of people signs of change are not clearly perceived ...



Help me… each lost minute can not be recovered  and might result in  appalling consequences...



Vidéo démo






Open letter to inventors



Not communicate and hide facts is a crime against humanity and a crime against life...





Open letter to inventors





This letter is intended to those who already invented and those who are about to invent.

Its goal is to prepare you to what you should expect.


It’s also a letter to those who would like to know what is to be expected from our civilization.


Before all be sure that invent is neither an easy process nor is it given to anybody though one try to persuade you of the contrary.


Innovative people are those who made our world thanks to their assiduous work but also because they fought against established ideas, the human silliness and often by taking risks for their life.


This remains actual and you should know it before embracing an adventure which might cost you.


As an example we should remember Galileo which was in danger of being burned alive, just because he got the courage to tell the truth. But closer to us we could spoke from all those, numerous and anonymous, who faced ruin and destruction at the hand of the existing system and who end up with death.


Nobody will ever speak about them, though they are thousands. I must warn you, for if they are often considered as strange, funny or paranoid some people know how to make profit of them. If some believe that they are paranoid it is not only because of famous movies such as “Return to the future” featuring Doctor Brown and his machine to wind up time; it is because they are paranoid, and following my own experience, they are right to be so!


Let me introduce myself to you. I am Mister Jean-Luc Quéré, a French citizen, and a biotechnologist. I have privately developed various revolutionary technologies. Some of them have not been patented because I have no willingness to patent them. I will later explain myself on this issue.


If my inventions remained private it is because they are getting beyond current knowledge.


Like those, who at the beginning of the twentieth century, thought they could fly I have only received mockeries and stupid comments up to the negation of my work, without justification.


Obviously I have not got any support but a lot of traps. It is to believe that my possible success to develop something which was impossible was considered as a hindrance for many people.

They then decided to eliminate me.


Human beings are sometimes desperately stupid, there is nothing to do about it. The human being silliness is equivalent to our own potential…..infinite.


Whatever the difficulties encountered I have developed technologies allowing the treatment of carbon dioxide while transforming it into a raw material producing energy.


Owing to the global warming, it is hard to believe it , but it is true! 


The self proclaimed “specialists” ,owing to their silliness, will tell you that it is not possible; like before when they would have burned Galileo to claim that the earth was flat like their own intelligence.


Do not laugh please, it is not ironical, it is the truth. For quite a long time now I do not want to laugh.


I have developed this technology alone, against all odds. Proud of this accomplishment I wanted to have my rights recognized.


Like any other inventor I have queried on how to have my discovery being protected. I ended up dealing with a state agency called the INPI which stands for the Industrial Property National Institute.


At the institute, civil servants told me that I should deposit a patent to have my rights being recognized. Not having the funds available, I asked a private society to help me finance the patent deposit.


This society, though located in public offices was in fact an empty shell, composed of crooks that filled their pockets on my back and the one of other victims. We are dealing here about abuse of trust, fraudulent practice, blackmail, intimidation, threat of kidnapping, torture and death.


There is no reason to be paranoid, indeed!  


In France, the country of human rights, please. This is not very encouraging for the rest of the world !


But this is not the most important, for crooks of this kind, using sordid practices to ruin and spoil inventors are many.


The true problem is that this kind of individual makes a profit of what I though for a long time was a failure of the judiciary system together with the system supposed to protect industrial property.


The truth is even worst, the industrial property system is indeed made to ruin inventors and force them to be associated with a third party.


Still worst, once inventors are trapped, the patent system is a very efficient tool to spoil them and turn them into vulnerable people subject to breaches of human rights.


Worst also are the laws, contrary to the constitution, which have been passed in France to facilitate such criminal acts and protect those who are behind these crimes.


These are not words in the air, but authenticable facts!

If you do not believe me, let me explain it to you.


In 2005, I signed an association contract with a French company called Segitech.


Few times later, a patent was deposited by the expert cabinet Breese-Derambure- Majerowitz.


According to the contract, depositors should have been myself and Segitech. (as stated in the letter, from the expert cabinet, dated 01 of March 2005)


Actually, the patent was established, bearing different depositors’names, hardly a month after the correspondence from the industrial property counsel.


New depositors were, myself, the society Brevets et Associés and a Spanish registered society named Finercor.


Two other bodies completely unknown to me and coming out of nowhere.


This is of the utmost  importance,  for it is a characterized breach of the initial contract and, in addition,  a way to avoid any possible prosecution.


It is only later that I was made aware that Mr Garnier, the Finercor’s manager, benefited outrageously from this illegal transfer.     


This is a serious breech of contract and a technique to escape judicial prosecution.


Pursue a judicial process in France will result in further ruin for me.


What is important to underline at this point is that the expert in industrial property abused his position to deposit, at the request of crooks, a patent on behalf of a society which had no legal rights upon my invention.


Worst is that the INPI agreed on this, legalizing de facto a spoil without any check, whatsoever.


Here we speak about a clear case of spoil, fraud, abuse of trust from people able to sell anything, with the seriousness of well established institutions.


From this very moment there were two solutions.


The first one, to work at my own expenses without compensation - a form of modern slavery.


The second one, to agree to lose the patent.


The INPI not feeling responsible of this situation, I was then force to engage into a judicial process, at my own expenses.


The whole process would at least take a decade during which the crooks would have been given time to abandon the patent procedure which would have costed me an awful amount of money.

Very likely, some dozens or hundreds of thousands Euros.


If something similar happens to you, do not insist. You have lost and should think to start a new life.


Myself in front of the global warming and its associated risks I have preferred to persevere.


I will not bother you further with all the hiccups to go back to what follows.


One year later an unscrupulous person called  Mr Jean Garnier, flanked by a new industrial property expert, came back with a co-property contract which reduced my rights, his own  obligations and moreover contained a so called “tonting”1.


A clause stipulated that in case of my death, my heirs would lose their rights to the benefit of the crooks. Signing this document was equivalent to sign my death arrest.


I formally refused and the expert did not hesitate a minute to resort to blackmail.


I had to sign otherwise the patent would end up in the garbage can for he would refuse to finance the national patent deposit.


I like our planet but not to the point to die for it.  The clause expressed by the crooks was all too clear.


On year after this episode during which I fought desperately without succumbing to blackmail while obtaining  partial consideration, the crooks put some cards on the table.


They did it  owing to the economic potential of my invention which is estimated at  more than 60 billions Euros for Europe only, without the energy project.


Mr Garnier the representative of Finercor had sold, without my agreement, parts of the patent to third parties for an amount equivalent to 125.000 Euros.


He was indeed acting like a spare parts seller when I was myself trying to save the planet from the carbon sterilization.


Under strong constraint, a co-property contract was signed.


This new contract, like the initial one was not respected.


Being already ruined I decided then to stop working at my own expenses unless they decide to respect their engagements.


Sincerely believing that I had reached the bottom I discovered thru a mail that another expert, Mister Roland Nithardt had also cheated me, depositing a new European patent without giving me any information.


It was a new case of abuse of trust, fraud and spoil . What I call a White Collar Organized Crime.

Unfortunately for them the technology I developed is far more complicated than expected.

Very quickly, they discovered, while trying to sell it to Total or AirLiquide that they were very far away from mastering it, despite the recruitment of experts and consulting people from the CNRS (National Centre for Scientific Research).


Without my presence and knowledge they were nothing.


They only got a patent without any possibility to exploit it, but the very possibility to pressure me and paralyse my invention.


That’s what they did!


The OEB (Office Européen des Brevets), the European Patent Office reprimanded them thru a five page document containing several recall to the article 84CBE.


The latter clearly stipulates that the patent deposit should clearly spell out all characteristics of the invention


I was partially made aware of this detail only eight days after their odious blackmail. I either  agreed to fill the gaps or the patent was to be discarded. Eight days to reassemble the missing parts was equivalent to making a miracle. 


https://register.epoline.org/espacenet/application?documentId=ENMWPI2F5097FI4&number=EP08000083&lng=en )


Let’s make a short stop on the article 84CBE. It clearly exists to make sure that all the secrets of the inventor can not escape to “men of the art” who would replicate the invention.


What is its goal, tell me?


Simply, to get rid of the inventor. Indeed, when you have released everything why to pay the inventor for his work ?


In my case, the expert Mister Nithardt, abused me to deposit a patent. However, without my knowledge and my help, he failed!


The European Patent Office recalled him about the article 84 CBE which does not authorize the deposit of a patent which would spoil the inventor.


Finally, the European Patent Office, unwilling to respect its own rules and the terms of the article 84CBE, validated the scam and cashed money.


I do not want here to add more weight to all what I already suffered. I prefer to come straight to what irritates me most:


- the abuse committed by the industrial property expert Mister Nihardt,


- the position of the European Patent Office which covered a criminal act.


Mister Nihardt participated actively to blackmail and intimidation. He dissimulated his acts with the help of /or in abusing industrial protection bodies in Europe, the United States, Australia and Canada.


He still refuses, today, to provide me with a single piece of document.


The European Patent Office as well as the INPI has both refused to provide me with a single element, hiding themselves behind a secret clause which forbids, during 18 months, the providing of a document or parts of it to foreign persons.


Cynically enough I am considered as a foreign person with regard to my own invention.


Particularly chocked by the attitude of the expert Mister Nihardt I decided to contact the CNCPI, the Industrial Protection Counselling National Company in order to raise the issue.

After several month during which I literally harassed them, Mister François Pochart, its acting secretary, responded to me via a mail dated 18 September 2009.


Here is the content of the mail.


« Mister Quéré,

Our confrere has deposited a patent request following the instructions of his client. I do not think that it is possible for a counselling body to verify whether the request is fraudulent or not. To say that our confrere has deposited a patent without your consent is not the reality. Our confrere has acted authoritatively at the request of the depositor”end of quote


One can notice the cynics of Mister Pochart who was perfectly aware that his confrere Mr Nihardt knew the fraudulent aspect of his client’s request.


In order to be on the safe side Mr Nihardt requested a payment in advance to prevent what happened to his predecessors who were not paid.


Mr Nihardt himself is the one who abused the inventor, not his client. Mister Nihardt is the one who billed his client for the time spent studying the documents.


He recognized it, in writing, stating that he did it without my help.


Mister Nihardt is still the one who filled the documents deposited before the European Patent Office, while dissimulating some elements. It is more subtle than a faked document but, morally and legally, it is similarly arguable.


Mister Nihardt is always  the one who resorted to blackmail to force me to sign the documents used to deposit the patent in the United States, without translation and justification other than “ sign or you may lose everything!”


I would like to come back to the content of Mister Pochart’s letter.


This is the cause of a deep resentment and indignation to me. Indeed, it means that experts in industrial property are no less than mercenaries.


They can inter alia abuse, spoil, blackmail inventors and retrench themselves behind the fact that they are only executive bodies. I do what I am told to do and I am not responsible.


What a slap in your face!


This was confirmed, not precisely with those words, by Mister Dearambure Christian, the CNPI president who supported the wordings of Mister Pochart.


If a man paid to kill was using the same ethical rule, he could come to your residence, kill your and your relatives, sit in your sofa while drinking your best whisky and wait for the police to come.


Once the police there, he could simply say that he was paid to kill without being responsible.


He could then leave undisturbed.


These experts are cashing between two and three hundred Euros an hour, but they are not responsible. It is very highly paid for having no responsibility!


Personally I found all this purely cynical. After years of constraints, abuses of all kinds, life threats I might not be truly objective, I do recognize.


The first reaction I had was to inform all inventors, as quickly as possible, about the nuisance potential of industrial property experts. I do consider my action as a moral and civic deed.


Mister Derambure Christian, the CNPI president after a strong support, by mail, to his secretary, which triggered a correct but outraged response from my side, specified to me,

Quote: “my previous e-mail, as well as this one, are strictly for you and for eyes only. They are not supposed to go public” end of quote.


Make use of confidentiality is a very practical weapon to hide crimes.


Except that in relation with industrial property, confidentiality bears on terms between the one ordering and  the executive person, not the contrary.


Moreover, none of them work on my behalf.


This is neither more nor less than a new attempt to gain a dominating position and to dissimulate to the inventors the potential nuisance of industrial property experts.


Now, if these crooks want to engage a legal procedure against me for I said the truth after being ruined and having nothing to lose; that is fine, let’s them do it.


Nobody is supposed to accept rules that crooks have put into place to act against you.


This is a civic deed which goes beyond laws of any nation.


Laws that we should not have forgotten, after the tragic consequences of the Nazi era.


Refuse to obey rules or laws based on injustice is a civic right, it is a moral deed and  beyond all consideration,  it is a human deed.